Saturday, February 27, 2021

Fwd: PPR'S REVIEW OF THE BOOK----TRIALS,TRIBULATIONS AND TRIUMPHS T.K.OOMMEN



       I have pleasure in forwarding my review of the  book " Trials,Tribulations and Triumphs " by T.K.Oommen.

Do read and respond.

P.P.Ramachandran.

28/02/2021.

*********************************************************

                                     


Trials, Tribulations and Triumphs by T.K.Oommen;

 Published by Konark Publications ;Pages 304 ; 

Price Rs.695/-

                               *******************

A popular Sanskrit verse enumerates the Best of

 Flowers, Cities, Deities and Men as follows.

Pushpeshu Champa -Nagareshu Lanka 

Purusheshu Vishnu - Nrupareshu Rama .


If one were to include the Best of Sociologists 

the verse would read as under---

Pushpeshu Champa -Nagareshu Lanka 

Purusheshu Vishnu - Nrupareshu Rama-

Samajashastre--Nipuna--Oommen Mahodayaha.


Oommen is recognised both in India and abroad as an outstanding sociologist. He is an author, educationist and Professor Emeritus at the Centre

 for the Study of Social Systems, J N U. He was awarded the Padma Bhushan for his services to

 the fields of education and literature. He has authored twenty books and edited ten books.


He took an M A in Sociology from Pune University and later he obtained PhD .

Oommen began his career as a lecturer in Social Sciences at Delhi University where he was the Reader in Sociology . He then moved to the Centre for the Study of Social Systems (CSSS), JNU as Associate Professor and became the Professor of Sociology .

Oommen received many awards for his services to the social milieu which included Padma Bhushan.

The book under review--Trials, Tribulations and Triumphs is not exactly an autobiography but 

a work-o-graphy as it recapitulates the life of 

India's highly respected sociologists and 

recounts his professional journey. He was stigmatized in JNU because of his neutral political position. He was elected as the President of International Sociological Association, the only sociologist to occupy this position so far from

 Asia and Africa. His doctoral thesis demanded intense fieldwork carried out in several villages

 in Rajasthan. His monograph Doctors and Nurses: A Study in Occupational Role Structures, also 

involved fieldwork which was conducted during summer breaks for over six years. His pioneering fieldwork and methods of amassing data were valuable additions to social sciences in general

 and sociology in particular. His work on the  agrarian crises in Kerala—which transformed 

him into a 'reactionary' for Leftist intellectuals— encouraged him to generate primary data from the field. Oommen did outstanding work for his memorable book "From Mobilization to Institutionalization: The Dynamics of Agrarian Movement in 20th Century Kerala."

He adopted a 'clinical' approach and one that dispassionately studies 'social facts'.

This memoir is divided into three major sections, encompassing 23 chapters and five appendices

The first section, 'Torments of Sociology' with 12 chapters, recounts Oommen's adopting a new discipline and his crucial role in building the

 Centre for the Study of Social Systems (CSSS)

 at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), his experience as a member of international 

sociological bodies, his academic accolades,

 his frustrating deal with the Indian Sociological Society and its administrative apparatus, and

 also the world of publishing. For many, great institutions are established through people's sacrifice and exemplary hard work. How political parties, faculties and student organisations 

affiliated to political parties subvert the democratic character of our academic institutions is well 

known. Student politics ipso facto need not be progressive. JNU has often been depicted as the campus with incredible, revolutionary, progressive student politics; however, it has had its own moments of unethical political acrobatics. 

Oommen points out,

By the 1990s, student politics became qualitatively different in JNU—the direct intervention of political parties in students' admissions became almost negligible. The emergence of a highly competitive political atmosphere within left politics in a way delegitimised and stigmatised such party interventions in student admissions .Highly 

inflated egos and vindictive personalities have damaged institutions significantly.

Our dream to bring in socialism has ended up strengthening bureaucratic regimentation and our desperation to establish a capitalist order has ushered in crony capitalism. Our institutions have unfortunately ended up promoting loyal disciples and replicating quasi-feudal values. It becomes abundantly clear that 'modern' institutions could

 not make us modern. This is certainly a more significant sociological problem than some of the manufactured crises.

Well known is the plight of students from 

vernacular medium and rural backgrounds in 

some of the highly elitist academic institutions .


The author's candid confessions and his own 

highly strenuous journey in these areas throws a flood of light on the mercilessly competitive world.

One chapter gives an insider's view of the 

progress of CESS over the years. The chapters 

on the World Congress of Sociology, provide interesting accounts of the author's role in them.

 The author recounts the inevitable contretemps

 and tensions . A few harsh comments of Oommen are worth recalling. "It is not uncommon in India

 that people relegate to the background a person's

achievements, if he or she has the requisite connections; "It seems to me that in India there

 are gurus and disciples, patrons and clients but

 not professionals and colleagues"

'Beyond Sociology'--the Second part--, deals with

 his other assignments. All the chapters will be useful for students of social sciences. The chapter on the global studies programme, offers a 

template as to how to develop a collaborative academic programme with overseas universities/institutions. This programme had 

great potential. A laudable contribution of 

Oommen is his commendable role in the Prime Minister's High-Level Committee or what is called 'Sachar Committee'. This committee's recommendations will be remembered for 

its long-term implications. The Sachar Committee report will remain a vital document for promoting 

the welfare of the largest religious minority—Muslims—in India. Similarly, the author's contributions in the Gujarat Harmony project and forays into social security studies would help 

young academics to conceptualise new ways of looking at socio-political crises of our times.

The third and final section of the volume contains four important speeches delivered by Oommen 

along with a list of his books, monographs and reports.

This memoir of an eminent Indian sociologist is

 not only a personal narration of his eventful academic journey, it also helps us understand 

some dimensions of the highly chequered 

trajectory of our higher education system, 

especially with regard to sociology. Establishing institutions requires a long-term vision with a missionary commitment coupled with profound scholarship in the chosen field. Oommen has

 always been an institution builder and a solid organisational man. This memoir, with its wide canvas, brings to the fore the story of a 

Nehruvian-liberal social scientist and his commitment towards building modern institutions. More importantly, it highlights how a man from a humble background from the southern tip of India with vernacular schooling ended up scaling the peaks of his chosen field. The book is a powerful political statement that people from the periphery

 too can make an enduring positive impact in 

India's ruthless hierarchical academia.

Pprof Damle wrote-- " I would not hesitate to call

 him 'Charvak of Indian Sociology'.He has been 

one of the most prolific,prodigious and productive scholars perhaps next only to Prof.G.S.Ghurye."

Bursting with racy anecdotes, the book provides insights into the functioning of the academic world 

through the discipline of sociology not only nationally but even globally. A world in which knowledge production and dissemination are becoming increasingly critical, the book also discusses the larger social and political context

 in which these activities are undertaken.

Written in a very lucid way, this book will be of interest to social scientists, scholars of media studies and general readers.

P.P.Ramachandran.

28/02/2021.

Friday, February 26, 2021

 Veer Savarkar by Akshay Jog ;Translated from

 Marathi by Amol Damle ; Published by Krishna

 Publications ; Pages 228 ; Price Rs 399/-

*************************************************

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was a great

 revolutionary in the history of India’s struggle of

 independence--- an orator par excellence, scholar,

 prolific writer, historian, poet, philosopher and

 social worker. He has been glorified and vilified in

 equal measure. 

A brief introduction to Savarkar.

He was born on May 28, 1883. Savarkar started       “ Mitra Mela”an organization which influenced the members to fight for “absolute political independence” of India.

The British Government withdrew Veer Savarkar’s graduation degree for his involvement in the Indian freedom movement . In June 1906 he went to London to study Law. Savarkar's revolutionary activities began while studying in India and England, where he was associated with the India House . He brought out publications supporting the cause of complete Indian independence by revolutionary means. He wrote a book “The Indian War of Independence 1857” on India’s struggle of independence, which was banned by the British. He supported the use of arms in India’s struggle of independence.

He was arrested in London on 13 March 1910 and sent to India for trial. Following a failed attempt to escape while being transported from Marseilles.

 Savarkar was sentenced to two life terms of imprisonment totalling fifty years and was moved to the Cellular Jail in the Andaman and Nicobar islands. By the persistent demand of leaders like Vithalbhai Patel, Tilak and Gandhi Savarkar was released and brought back to India on May 2, 1921.

Savarkar was initially kept in Ratnagiri jail. He later founded the Ratnagiri Hindu Sabha to preserve ancient Indian culture and work for social welfare. He joined the Swaraj Party, formed by Tilak and founded the Hindu Mahasabha, a separate political party and was elected its President. The party opposed the formation of Pakistan. Veer Savarkar was charged by the Government of India in the Mahatma Gandhi assassination case but was acquitted by the Supreme Court of India.

His social activity was aimed solely to help humanity.

Savarkar passed away on February 26, 1966 at the age of 83.

While in jail, Savarkar wrote extensively on Hindutva, espousing what it means to be a Hindu, and Hindu pride, which he defined as all the people descended of Hindu culture as being part of Hindutva, including Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs. In 1921, under restrictions after signing a plea for clemency, he was released on the condition that he renounce revolutionary activities. Savarkar endorsed the ideal of India as a Hindu Rashtra and opposed the Quit India struggle in 1942, calling it a “Quit India but keep your army" movement. He became a fierce critic of the Indian National Congress and its acceptance of India’s partition.


When in the Cellular jail, Savarkar was denied pen and paper. He composed and wrote his poems on the prison walls with thorns and pebbles, memorised thousands of lines of his poetry for years till other prisoners returning home brought them to India.


While imprisoned he wrote Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu? , coining the term Hindutva(“Hinduness”), which defined Indian culture as a manifestation of  Hindu values.

When Gandhi was assassinated in 1948 by a former member of the Mahasabha, Savarkar was implicated, but he was acquitted in his subsequent trial because of insufficient evidence.


The book under review is an English translation of the original Marathi book of Akshay Jog.The author is an Electronics engineer—who has conducted research for ten years on Savarkar. He is a regular speaker on Savarkar and he is also a  member of the research team of the new film Savarkar.

Akshay Jog has made a frontal attack on the vicious campaign carried out for the last 25 years against Savarkar, vilifying him and belittling his great contribution to Indian society. The sub-title of the book is “Systematic Rebuttal of allegations on Savarkar with proof”.

Savarkar was the fountainhead of the concept of Hindutva—a word he coined .He was the intellectual base of the Hindutva movement.

Savarkar had submitted ten mercy petitions to the British government from 1911 to 1923.He himself has mentioned these in his book “My Life Imprisonment”.His intention was to deceive the British, get rid of punishment and fight for the nation instead of rotting in a cell.He demanded a comprehensive release of prisoners across the nation as well as abroad and hoping to get the State pardon for all.

Savarkar’s petition had the following four demands which proved that his plea was not selfish but for all prisoners.

1.Unconditional and comprehensive release of all political offenders serving the imprisonment in and outside India.

2.Responsible governing power or Self government.

3.Effective majority in legislature.

4.No question to be asked about the earlier revolutionary activities, conspiracies and the persons involved.

He never betrayed his fellow revolutionaries or his nation.

The author tackles allegations that Savarkar demanded pension, opposed the tricolour flag favouring the saffron flag, aversion to Muslims, non-participation in protests by political prisoners, co-operation with the war efforts.

One chapter is devoted to the charge that Savarkar was the mastermind behind the murder of Gandhi.Quoting chapter and verse from the Kapur Commission the author absolves him of any role.

Savarkar did not espouse a two nation theory but believed that there are two nations in India—the Hindus and the Moslems. He declared—‘We shall ever guarantee protection to the religion,culture and language of the minorities for themselves." This subject is cogently analysed.

Regarding Savarkar’s stand on the Quit India movement he believed with Clement Attllee that its influence on Britain was ‘Minimal’.

The author explains Savarkar’s stand on a number of topics--Subhas Chandra Bose,the Princely States, Fascism and Nazism.

Akshay Jog demolishes with consummate ease the spurious allegations against Savarkar and proves the relevance of the great leader when he was alive and even today.

Savarkar possessed a number of distinctive marks---- character, amazing presence of mind, indomitable courage, unconquerable confidence in his capability to achieve great things.

Akshay Jog’s book confirms this abundantly.

The book is a must read for all admirers of Savarkar and all students of India’s freedom struggle.


P.P.Ramachandran.

21/02/2021.